"Frankly, I do not myself feel at all like my Tudor forebear, who was blessed with neither husband nor children, who ruled as a despot and was never able to leave her native shores."

- QE II during her 1953 Christmas address

I have to admit I was rather shocked by the above quote. It is in my opinion a rather harsh, and completely inaccurate statement in regards to Elizabeth I.

Is it any wonder then that Tudor historian - mega star David Starkey had this to say about Her Majesty, "The Queen is uncultured and poorly educated." He says a lot more in this article that was featured last month in Pink News. Here is a snippet:

The openly gay historian Dr David Starkey has said the Queen is uninterested in her predecessors because she was poorly educated.

He told the Guardian: "I think she's got elements a bit like Goebbels in her attitude to culture.
"You remember: 'Every time I hear the word culture I reach for my revolver'."

He recounted an occasion where he showed Her Majesty around an exhibition he had curated about Elizabeth I at the National Maritime Museum in 2003, where he found her more-preoccupied with the late arrival of a her drink, a gin and Dubonnet than the works of art on display. He claims that her only comment was that one of the objects belonged to her

Dr Starkey said that reminded him of "a housewife" who had been left some possessions: "She'd looked after them, she'd put in place much better arrangements for their care, but again - I suppose it's this absence of any kind of, to be blunt, serious education."

He compared her to Elizabeth I, who also acceded the throne at 25, "was 20 times as well educated. And had either five or six languages".

Full Article Here

Wow! He might as well have called her an ignorant, Nazi! I think he did!

NO O.B.E for Starkey any time soon I think....better then what would have happened to him during Elizabeth I reign me thinks